PaleoBabble

Dispraxis writes: I'm one of the users requesting. PaleoBabble

---

Addendum to my Elohim Sitchin Searches Posted: 11 Jul 2009 03:04 PM PDT I recently had a request from a user of our software (Logos/Libronix) for the search I created as part of the video Imade on elohim in the Hebrew Bible–which shows point-blank that Zecharia Sitchin is completely wrong with respect to what he says about elohim. Alas, I deleted my search and can’t reproduce it exactly since the video cuts off a few lines of it. But not to worry for anyone out there who would like the searches (and who have the software, obviously). Below are two new searches. I’ve simplified the parameters a bit, and so the result numbers aren’t exactly what the video shows. I don’t feel like redoing the video (the site is what needs my attention). Just click on the links and you’ll be able to donwload the files in Libronix. Put them at My Documents/Libronix DLS/SyntaxQueries. If you don’t have the syntax query folder, it’s because you never saved one of your own (you’ll have to go to Search>Syntax Search in Libronix and make one up and save it to first create that folder). Search 1: Elohim as a noun and the subject of a third masculine singular finite verb (367 occurrences). Download the file HERE by right clicking and choosing “Save Link As”. Make sure you put it in the folder described above AND that the extension of the file is *.lbxstq (downloading it off the blog and saving may change it to a text file, which is no good in Libronix). Search 2: same as above but I added ha-elohim as a subject (elohim + definite article; 465 occurrences). Download the file HERE by right clicking and choosing “Save Link As”. Make sure you put it in the folder described above AND that the extension of the file is *.lbxstq (downloading it off the blog and saving may change it to a text file, which is no good in Libronix). Technorati Tags: elohim, Sitchin

Email delivery powered by Google

1.5 members and growing!

Dispraxis asks:
Is the democratic party in real decline?

[TC-Alternate-list] Codex Sinaiticus, Tischendorf, and J Rendel Harris

Codex Sinaiticus is online, and now the whole high-speed-connected world can see the manuscript, right down to the stichoi-notes!
It is inevitable that the new online publication will lead many viewers to read accounts about how Tischendorf "rescued" the codex from the monks at St. Catherine's. So I take this opportunity to say:
Tischendorf's story is not true.
The codex was essentially stolen. It was borrowed under the pretense that Tischendorf would return it on request.
As for Tischendorf's claim that he rescued part of the manuscript from a trash-basket, and that the basket's contents were about to be burned -- J. Rendel Harris has some interesting things to say about that in the 1908 February issue of The Expositor, which is available to download online, in the course of his article/review, "Dr. Gregory on the Canon and Text of the New Testament." Whereas Gregory took Tischendorf's side entirely, Harris is the complete opposite.
J. Rendel Harris was uniquely qualified to judge the plausibility of Tischendorf's claims, having visited St. Catherine's monastery himself. And Harris, as you will see when you read his remarks, provides good reasons to reject Tischendorf's version of events. Yet that fabrication -- whether promoted innocently, or with calculation, God knows -- is still being promoted.
This is an opportune moment for the British Library to do the right thing and offer to return Codex Sinaiticus to St. Catherine's Monastery. There has been a little bit of publicity about the online release of the photographs. It would be more, and better, publicity, in my book, if the people in charge at the BL would admit that Codex Sinaiticus was essentially stolen, and offer to return it to its rightful owners at St. Catherine's Monastery.
Yours in Christ,
James Snapp, Jr.

------------------------------------
The informal cafe for TC chatYahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TC-Alternate-list/

[Real World Atheism] moral angst

What if The Batman was a man's man?
http://www.bilerico.com/2008/07/when_batman_was_gay.php
mIke
cdesign proponentsists: eschew obfuscation, espouse elucidation.

------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/realworldatheism/

Some present topics on "Origins": ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN

A message from Dr. Terence Meaden to all members of ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN on Atheist Nexus!
'Toy Universe' Could Solve Life's Origins. By Robert Tobin. 2 July 2009
The Investigation: "God is One" and "God is Love" By Claudia M. Mazzucco
"A Speculation on the Origins and Evolution of Theism" By Carver
Bringing Girls and Boys to Computer Science By Brad Feaker
Visit ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN at:
http://www.atheistnexus.org/groups/group/show?id=2182797%3AGroup%3A109911
--

On Atheist Nexus: First BDay Coming Soon! We need your help.

A message to all members of Atheist Nexus
On July 10th Atheist Nexus will be one year old! Please help us get to 10,000 members by this day. Email your friends or use the "Invite tab" on Nexus.
Nexus member, Kristy Vensson has sent the below letter to her friends and invites you to send it to yours.
Thanks!
Brother Richard

Hi all!
Atheist Nexus celebrates its 1st birthday on July 10, and it has a goal of reaching 10,000 members by this day. Please consider joining.
Nexus provides a 'theist-free' zone for nontheists to chat, debate, blog and give others support. The site includes numerous forums, blogs, and a chat room.
Also, there are 485 groups on Nexus. Some are national and regional groups which can put you in touch with local nontheists. Others are interest related: science, photography, writing, parenting, Shakespeare, GLBT, evolution, etc.
Primarily, Nexus provides social support for nontheists. However, it is not in competition with other organizations. In fact, one of its aims is to support them. Many already have their own groups on Nexus: American Atheists, Atheist Alliance International, American Humanist Association, Secular Student Alliance, and many more.
Prominent nontheist members include PZ Myers, Margaret Downey, Roy Speckhardt (AHA), Dale McGowan, Hemant Mehta (The Friendly Atheist), and James Morrow (author of the Godhead trilogy).
Nexus has also attracted many academics. Oxford educated Dr Terence Meaden runs a successful group called "Origins: Universe, Life, Humankind and Darwin". Professor Tom Arcaro drew on Nexus members for his recent sociological study of over 8,000 atheists. Nexus Member, Emeritus Professor Robert A M Gregson of the Australian National University provided invaluable support and advice in drafting the recent Atheist Nexus submission to the Australian Human Rights Commission on "Freedom of Religion and Belief".
In order to have any voice, nontheists must unite, and Nexus provides a central point for us to come together in solidarity.
Please join!
Visit Atheist Nexus at: http://atheistnexus.org
--
To control which e-mails you receive on Atheist Nexus, go to:
http://atheistnexus.org/profiles/profile/emailSettings

[TC-Alternate-list] The Oldest Known Lectionary

A while ago, J Borland asked a question about what was the earliest known lectionary. I was going to answer by saying that P62 (I think it's P62, anyway) is possibly from a lectionary. But I remembered that Jost Gippert and others are working on one of the "new finds" ("New" in the sense that they were found in 1975): a lectionary containing text from Matthew, Luke, and John in the otherwise nearly extinct language of Udi.
This is probably the earliest known lectionary MS. You can learn more about it at
http://titus.fkidg1.uni-frankfurt.de/armazi/sinai/prelacc.htm
including pictures.
Yours in Christ,
James Snapp, Jr.

------------------------------------
The informal cafe for TC chatYahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TC-Alternate-list/

A Circle Of Logic In Reality: ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN

A message from Kiema Inc to all members of ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN on Atheist Nexus!
Please join me at http://xcircle.ning.com a platform i just launched the anti faith, god, church & religion.
Visit ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN at:
http://atheistnexus.org/groups/group/show?id=2182797%3AGroup%3A109911
--

RE: Superconsciousness Skeptic Mangles ZEITGEIST (and Religious History) - Again!

Posted by: "John F. Felix DIAGroup" jffelix61@
Date: Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:57 am ((PDT))

Dispraxis writes:

I hate when my e-mail address is in the subject line! Anyway...

Unfortunately (?) I don't subscribe to the Skeptic mag, only the e-newsletter. Back when Acharya posted a link to the original Callahan article (http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic09-02-25#feature), her rebuttal (http://stellarhousepublishing.com/skeptic-zeitgeist.html) and Callahan's re-rebut here: (http://www.runboard.combiblicalprophesyandmythology.f22.t91), I was assaulted by such statements from Callahan as:

'Of course I avoid the "Testimonium Flavianum," bacause I know it's a forgery. You're faulting me for this?
As far as I know, there is no reason to see the James passage as a forgery, while there is every reason to see the so-called "Testimonial" as a forgery.'

Would you trust a document with an admitted forgery in one place, in any other place? And there *is* "reason to see the James passage as a forgery," from two other source besides me, but I won't bore the group with my own theories, yet Earl Doherty thought of it as a possibility (see also Suns of God), because in the very same section of Josephus, the (ex) high priest Jesus is mentioned, so either "the one called Christ" is an interpolation, or it is a reference not to any Messiah, but to Jesus the high priest who was removed from office, and who could be seen as the one "annointed," or the true high priest, in contrast to the new one seen as an illegitimate pretender. Or maybe Christians have been unknowingly worshipping Jesus the ex-high priest for two millenia!

And after seeing Tim debate Christians on video, I'd say that his problem, IMO, with Acharya is that he is not knowlegable enough to debate such issues as the dying-resurrecting god motif with a Christian scholar, and she no doubt in my mind is, so she is perhaps seen both a rival and as an object of envy. since he's promulgating basically the same ideas, but lacks the in-depth knowledge to present a coherent and evidence-based case. One point he was asked to provide scholarly-accepted evidence for Dionysus' resurrection pre-dating Christianity. I thought I could almost tell he wanted to quote sources that probably Acharya is the only one ever to cite, but he just couldn't do it. :)

After listening to Acharya speak and reading a great deal of her books and posts, I know that she can get worked up, but Callahan accuses her of savagely attacking people who don't agree with her, but I can honestly say, this is a misinterpretation. What irks her, I believe, is how people seem to hold on to a belief or opinion or factual interpretation in the face of such overwhelming evidence in support of the mythicist position, not even mentioning the prominence of astrotheological sources at the basis of all religions. So, to me, it seems more frustration than anything else, especially when I can clearly detect from her many posts how tiring it must become to possess such erudation and have to argue against the same uninformed attacks everyday.

Now, concerning the Jesus Project, of which I knew nothing about, I read on their website that they expanded their focus into Quranic studies, and since I don't know all the details of the unfortunate abduction of your kid, I was thinking that their move was motivated because of your apparent anti-Islamic public positions, i.e., for political rather than any other stated "official" reasons they may have offered, but I'm speculating.

John F. Felix

____________________________________
Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc

Dispraxis was edited

Recent changes on Dispraxis

• Page Damascus Document Sneak Peek
• File damascus_doc(CD)01.pdf

Page Damascus Document Sneak Peek

edited by John F. Felix (diagroup@)

The Dead Sea Scrolls interlinear
The "sneak peek" is now available here in .pdf format:
(Use your browser back button to return here.)
The Damascus Document (CD)
The Damascus Document (Covenant of Damascus) was known from the Cairo geniza before the discovery of the DSS in the caves of Qumram. Considered by the supposed Qumram sect as extremely important to their religious way of life, it probably began as a religious treatise expanded to include rules and commentary for the group over a span of time.
This new interlinear
Fortunately there are e-texts available for the DSS sectarian documents. I am eagerly awaiting the release of an e-text of the Dead Sea Scrolls Bible, due sometime soon (I hope). However, there is as yet no good electronic wedding of the DSS to an English interlinear or translation, although there are two popular print English translations recommended:
The Dead Sea Scrolls, A New Translation, Revised Edition by Michael O. Wise, Martin G. Abegg, Jr., and Edward M. Cook, HarperSanFrancisco, 1996, 2005.
The Complete Dead Sea Scrolls in English, Revised Edition by Geza Vermes, Penguin Books, 1962-2004.
Each version above is represented in this interlinear sneak peek, which are for my own use. The third column is my own translation.
About the sneak peek PDF file
The DSS are not arranged into chapter and verse, but rather column and line, so the system has been altered in the Excel file used to produce this text. The Hebrew or Aramaic is unpointed, but pointed lexical entries are given, as well as the GK numbers, if applicable, and I am also disambiguating the Louw-Nida numbers.
This interlinear is literally pressing the limits of what I am capable of as an amateur Biblical scholar!
The CD Interlinear and this page Copyright (c) 2009 by John F. Felix. All rights reserved.

Edited at 1:37 PM on June 25, 2009

Re: Superconsciousness Link shared by dispraxis

If you get that article by Callahan, send it. Acharya's recent "nemesis" gets front-page coverage; ironic, since IMO THE classic case in skeptical thinking is the entire biblical-critical school, using scientific rationality to reveal the non-historicity of Tim's "apologetic. " http://www.skeptic. com/the_magazine / [Message sent by dispraxis@ via AddThis.com. ]

__._,_.___

Please support Acharya by visiting http://www.truthbeknown.com Help spread the word and post this site wherever you can!

Re: Superconsciousness Skeptic Mangles ZEITGEIST (and Religious History) - Again!

As many know, I rebutted this article months ago. It is my understanding that, although he read my rebuttal, Callahan made next to no relevant changes and repeats the same tired and refuted canards.
Here's my rebuttal:
http://stellarhousepublishing.com/skeptic-zeitgeist.html
With such shallow - and UN-skeptical - commentary, it seems to me that Skeptic is quickly making itself irrelevant.
In the same regard, as I suspected, the Jesus Project - which unceremoniously removed me as Fellow after I informed these "humanists" that I had security issues because of my son's abduction - has likewise fizzled.
--- In superconsciousness@, jffelix61@... wrote:
>
> Acharya's recent "nemesis" gets front-page coverage; ironic, since IMO THE classic case in skeptical thinking is the entire biblical-critical school, using scientific rationality to reveal the non-historicity of Tim's "apologetic."
>
> http://www.skeptic.com/the_magazine/
>
> [Message sent by dispraxis@... via AddThis.com.]
>

------------------------------------
Please support Acharya by visiting http://www.truthbeknown.com Help spread the word and post this site wherever you can!Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/superconsciousness/

Superconsciousness Link shared by dispraxis

Dispraxis writes:

Acharya's recent "nemesis" gets front-page coverage; ironic, since IMO THE classic case in skeptical thinking is the entire biblical-critical school, using scientific rationality to reveal the non-historicity of Tim's "apologetic."

http://www.skeptic.com/the_magazine/

[Message sent by dispraxis@ via AddThis.com.]

------------------------------------

Please support Acharya by visiting http://www.truthbeknown.com Help spread the word and post this site wherever you can!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/superconsciousness/

Randigram for June 19, 2009

Become a Member | About the JREF | About James Randi | Contact the JREF June 19, 2009

Unsubscribe info at the bottom JREF Activities & Events http://www.amazingmeeting.com THERE IS STILL TIME! Though our block of rooms at South Point has expired, you may still find rooms at their site. TAM 7 is not sold out. You will be able to register at the door, if need be. Captain Disillusion Meets His Match Faced with an apparently unsolvable challenge, the perennial Captain Disillusion is ready to give up, and until a familiar force offers a helpful hand. Do not miss this! Direct link to YouTube video here. SWIFT Digest The official blog of the JREF, here are this week's entries: This week's topics include: Bats in the Bellfry from Jeff Wagg What is it with Baseball players? They're big, strong, well-paid... and yet some of them are afraid to sleep in a hotel alone. No, I'm not making this up. Others sleep with a baseball bat by their side. Are they afraid of paparazzi? Jealous wives and girlfriends? No. They're afraid of ghosts. WISN in Milwaukee reports that a local hotel, the newly remodeled Pfister, is scaring ballplayers from many visiting teams. You can check out their video report here. Read more SAPS at TAM from Alison Smith You might've noticed that SAPS has, lately, fallen off the grid a little while I sat around contemplating the wisdom of being on a television show called Door to the Dead. With The Amaz!ng Meeting coming so fast, though, I've been forced out of my funk and into participating in a big way. SAPS is involved in a lot of events at TAM 7, and here are some of them, if you'd like to be involved too. Read more Book Review: Science Under Siege from Harriet Hall A new book has just come out that will be of interest to skeptics everywhere. Science Under Siege: Defending Science, Exposing Pseudoscience. Edited by Kendrick Frazier, it is a collection of some of the best writing from Skeptical Inquirer from the last few years: Some of the gems it contains: Carl Sagan's last Q & A on science and skeptical inquiry. A paean to the wonder and awe of real science by Sagan's wife, Ann Druyan. An article explaining Ray Hyman's Categorical Directive: "before we try to explain something, we should make sure it actually happened." John E. Jones, III's eloquent decision in the Dover "Intelligent Design" case. An article on AIDS denialism by Nicoli Nattrass, who is director of an AIDS research unit in South Africa and can testify to the incalculable harm denialism has caused her compatriots. Read more "Psychic" Rosemary Altea Scammed from Jeff Wagg Sometimes you have to ask: what good is it being psychic? As I'm not psychic, I will probably never know the answer to that question, but being psychic apparently doesn't protect you from having your accountant run off with $200,000 of your "hard-earned" money. Such a fate has befallen self-proclaimed psychic Rosemary Altea, who was exposed on Penn & Teller's Bullshit! as having a stacked audience for her reading. From the Rutland Herald article: Denise Hall of East Arlington faces one count of wire fraud and one count of filing a false tax return after investigators with the U.S. Attorney's office say she stole money from self-proclaimed spiritual medium Rosemary Altea - using four credit cards to obtain cash advances, forging checks and giving herself unauthorized electronic paychecks all under Altea's name for the past seven years, according to court records. So, for seven years, a bookkeeper was able to swindle money from Rosemary in ways that most of us would detect simply balancing our checkbooks. Read more Zicam Removed From Shelves by FDA from Jeff Wagg In a far too infrequent moment of proaction (or is that proactivity?), the FDA announced that they have issued Matrixx Initiatives, maker of these Zicam products, a warning letter telling it that these products cannot be marketed without FDA approval. What's the problem? Oh, nothing much… it just seems that using their product even once can permanently remove your sense of smell. And while we're not canines, and rely mostly on our visual sense, losing your sense of smell is a great way to increase your risk of death through fire, food contamination, or the over-consumption of durian. Read more MSNBC Jumps on the Anti-Alt Med Wagon from Jeff Wagg In the latest of a series of articles critical of "alternative" medicine, MSNBC proclaims that Zicam is not the only remedy that may harm your health. From the article: an Associated Press analysis of the Food and Drug Administration's side effect reports found that more than 800 homeopathic ingredients were potentially implicated in health problems last year. Complaints ranged from vomiting to attempted suicide. So once again, we're happy to see alternative medicine getting negative press. But hold on... homeopathy has no ingredients. How can they be harmful? Well, they can't. Read more Talking to the Dead - I Mean FoxNews from Jeff Wagg This week, beacon of truth FoxNews had an interview with two champions of reason: John Edward and Sean Hannity. Removing tongue from cheek, I present to you an interview that demonstrates two things: 1) it's still cool to be "the skeptic" and 2) to quote Southpark, "John Edward is the biggest douche in the universe." Note that the article is entitled "Medium John Edward Explains Ability." Really? Did whoever titled this piece actually read or see the interview? John Edward, when asked why he doesn't defend what he does, had this to say: Because as soon as — as soon as you have to defend something, then you're admitting that something needs defense. So I kind of, like — I come from a place of I'm a spiritual person. I believe in God. I would never defend my belief in God. People either do believe or they don't believe, and that's OK. That's their choice. So I feel the same way about this. As soon as I go to a place I have to defend it, I feel like you immediately lose. I have no problem explaining it, though, or trying to teach about it. Well, guess what John… if you want us to believe that you can TALK TO THE DEAD, yes, you're going to have to defend it. Do so succesfully, and we'll give you $1,000,000. This "non-answering" is a favorite technique of so-called psychics and mediums, as it puts all the pressure on the person who has questions, and make them feel guilty for somehow doubting such an esteemed individual. Alas, we skeptics are like that. Read more Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the ... by Daniel C. Dennett $14.04 $4.00 Quantity: JREF Tastefully-Bent Stainless Steel Fork Impress your friends with this mystically bent fork! [Product Details...] $19.00 The James Randi Educational Foundation (www.randi.org) is a not-for-profit organization that promotes critical thinking, science education, and skeptical inquiry by providing the public and the media with reliable information about paranormal, supernatural, and pseudoscientific claims. Randigram is the weekly e-bulletin of the JREF. Contents © 2006-2009 James Randi Educational Foundation.

Dispraxis was edited

Recent changes on Dispraxis

• File 02_mk_trc_02.pdf
• Page FrontPage
• Page FrontPage.1245502869
• Page TRC Mark Supplement

Page FrontPage

edited by John F. Felix

Only formatting differences

Edited at 8:04 AM on June 20, 2009

Page FrontPage.1245502869

removed by John F. Felix

Only formatting differences

Removed at 8:03 AM on June 20, 2009

Page FrontPage

edited by John F. Felix

Only formatting differences

Edited at 8:01 AM on June 20, 2009

File 02_mk_trc_02.pdf

uploaded by John F. Felix

02_mk_trc_02.pdf

Uploaded at 7:54 AM on June 20, 2009

Page FrontPage

edited by John F. Felix

Welcome to DIAGroup - Digital Interlinear Analysts Group wiki!
Just added:
→ Louw-Nida Sneak Peek
Scriptures → Greek → Christian → TRC → Mark → 1 Sneak Peak Peek 2 Supplement
Scriptures → Greek → LXX → Genesis → Sneak Peak Peek
General → Science Fiction → Kubrick 2001 →MoreRuminationsonKubrick's2001-Part1
General → Science Fiction → Battlestar Galactica → Ruminations on the BSG series - Part 1

Edited at 7:53 AM on June 20, 2009

Page TRC Mark Supplement

edited by John F. Felix (diagroup@)

Supplement to the Mark Sneak Peek main article.
The Excel file as it is constructed fulfills multiple project needs at once. One sub-project is to create a "resultant Greek" version of Mark, based on the three major codexes, namely, Sinaiticus (Aleph), Vaticanus (B) and Alexandrinus (A), in the tradition of Weymouth and the dreaded (by some) Concordant Greek New Testament. If anyone knows of an e-text of Weymouth's Resultant Greek Text, I would appreciate the information. The e-text that is actually available for the CGNT is NA 26/27 and/or Westcott-Hort, although a digitized eclectic text based on A. E. Knoch's work may be in the works.
will not quite meet up to the standards of this project. Meanwhile, much more will be included in brackets (i.e., italics) than Scrivener ever dreamt of, as well as a real attempt to "reverse engineer" a Greek text to match the English translation, which is merely an academic exercise, i.e., for "fun.". "fun.".
Louw-Nida Update - 06/20/2009!
Additional resources will be adapted for the main, or primary, project, specifically the use of "Louw-Nida" numbers for the TRC, which are numbers that map the Greek to their "semantic domains." This information will be very useful in deciding the text of the TRC.
As of 06/20/2009, the LN numbers have been added to the TC (Textus Criticus) collation, to form the basis for adding them to the TRC. Having the numbers is not enought, though, or else they would be no more useful than Strong's numbers. The process begun with Matthew is continuing, i.e., the numbers will be expanded into a hierarchical system, where the two-part LN number is broken into three parts:Domain, Sub-domain and Gloss, based on the Louw, J. P., & Nida, E. A. (1996, c1989). Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament : Based on semantic domains (electronic ed. of the 2nd edition.). New York: United Bible societies. Here is a link to a peek at a small section of Mark 1:6-7.
Louw-Nida Sneak Peek
However, I decided that though LN numbers are two-part, to add a sub-domain for each number, regardless of whether such exists in the 2nd edition of the lexicon, but I felt no need to create a new numbering system, i.e., one that has three parts. Thus, I am extending the lexicon based on my own semantic studies. The entries will look something like this eventually:
LN15.66→Movement (Linear)→Leave/Depart/Flee/Escape/Send→send→ αποστελλω
RGNT2009
Mark's "resultant Greek NT" (RGNT2009) text, based on א, A and B, Phase 1 is also complete, and can be seen in the sneak peek PDF file link!
Finally...
More texts are to be collated; I hope to include a version of the Peshitta in square Aramaic (which was done experimentally for Matthew, another project that I work on from time to time), rather than Syriac, for more detailed use with such software programs as Logos Bible Software's Libronix Library System, to interact with its rich Aramaic resources. Of course, the new collation entitled the Textus Receptus Criticalis is the main goal, but the collation that is finalized will go on to be a project of its own. This spreadsheet will continue as a separate tool once all resources are finished, because of the concordancing properties described in the main article.
The Textus Receptus Criticalis (TRC) and this page copyright (c) 2009 by John F. Felix. All rights reserved.

Edited at 7:48 AM on June 20, 2009

Manage your notification settings or just unsubscribe.